Home > Company news > LED Ring Chandeliers and LED Round Panel Light, which one is better

LED Ring Chandeliers and LED Round Panel Light, which one is better

  • 2024-03-07
  • View 6

LED Ring Chandeliers and LED Round Panel Light which one is better

 

LED ring chandeliers and LED panel lights, which one is better? In fact led ring chandeliers and led panel light each have their own characteristics. As for which one is better, it depends on the specific use environment and needs.

Here are some possible comparison points:

 

Lighting Effects:

LED ring chandeliers, generally provide more even, soft lighting, avoiding situations where the light is too bright or too weak. The lighting effect of panel lights may be affected by its size and layout, and sometimes uneven light may occur.

 

Beautiful design

The unique round design of the led ring chandelier is simple and modern, and can match various decorative styles. Panel lights may focus more on practicality and functionality, and the design is relatively simple.

 

High Efficacy

Both of led ring chandeliers and led panel light can make with high brightness led chips as its light source. The whole lamp light output up to 40 watts at 4800 lumen,light efficacy up to 120 lumens per watt. Special requirement also can do up to 140 lumens per watt.

 

Energy saving and environmental protection

Both types of lamps can use energy-efficient light sources such as LEDs, but the specific energy consumption may be different and need to be evaluated based on specific products and usage.

 

Applicable scene

Disk lights are suitable for scenes that require uniform and soft lighting, such as offices, conference rooms, etc. Panel lights may be more suitable for scenes that require accent lighting or local lighting, such as display cabinets, galleries, etc.

 

Installation and maintenance

Disk lights are usually simple in design and easy to install and maintain. Installation of panel lights may require more work, especially when the light panels need to be replaced.

cache
Processed in 0.017883 Second.